Eucalyptus is one of the highly economic tree species in the developing countries like India. In the present investigation, experiments on optimizing plant growth regulators in the micropropagation of promising inter specific Eucalyptus hybrid clones namely TNPL 191(E. camaldulensis× E. teriticornis), TNPL 192 (E. camaldulensis × E. pellita) and intra specific hybrid clone TNPL 193 (E. camaldulensis× E. camaldulensis) were conducted, following standard protocols developed for Eucalyptus. The results showed that the BAP concentration of 0.50 mg L-1 for bud induction, IAA concentration of 3.0 mg L-1 for shoot elongation and IBA concentration of 1.0 mg L-1 for rooting of all these clones were found optimal. However, these three hybrid clones responded differently to the concentration of BAP at shoot proliferation stage. While the hybrid TNPL 191 showed maximum shoot proliferation rate at the concentration of 0.2 mg L-1 of BAP, the hybrids TNPL 192 and TNPL 193 showed highest response at 0.15 mg L-1. All the in vitro rooted plantlets were acclimatized successfully to the prevailing natural environment. Thus, the protocols developed with respect to optimizing the plant growth regulators can be adapted in large scale micro propagation of inter and intra specific Eucalyptus hybrid clones.
Published in | Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 12, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jps.20241203.13 |
Page(s) | 82-89 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Eucalyptus Hybrid, Micropropagation, BAP, IAA, IBA
Shoot initiation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAP(mg L-1) | Shoot initiation rate (%) | Shoot length (cm) | ||||
TNPL 191 | TNPL 192 | TNPL193 | TNPL 191 | TNPL 192 | TNPL 193 | |
0.25 | 47.07 ± 0.64c | 58.78 ± 2.89c | 44.40 ± 2.34c | 2.30 ±0.40b | 2.03 ± 0.25c | 1.53 ± 0.35b |
0.50 | 58.79 ± 2.48ab | 76.78 ± 2.70ab | 55.36 ± 2.70a | 3.53 ± 0.45a | 3.70 ± 0.20a | 2.73 ± 0.25a |
0.75 | 59.67 ± 1.81a | 70.43 ± 2.40a | 52.27 ± 1.53ab | 2.70 ± 0.60ab | 3.03 ± 0.45b | 2.03 ± 0.25b |
1.00 | 54.57 ± 2.45b | 58.37 ± 2.63b | 50.41 ± 4.84ab | 2.53 ± 0.55b | 2.13 ± 0.15c | 1.73 ± 0.35b |
Control | 12.37 ± 1.64d | 19.30 ± 1.09d | 9.71 ± 0.79d | 0.73 ± 0.25c | 0.57 ± 0.31d | 0.57 ± 0.31c |
LSD (P< 0.05) | 4.245 | 8.809 | 23.96 | 0.218 | 0.085 | 0.093 |
Shoot multiplication | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAP(mg L-1) | Number of shoots per clump | Shoot length (cm) | ||||
TNPL 191 | TNPL 192 | TNPL193 | TNPL 191 | TNPL 192 | TNPL 193 | |
0.10 | 10.00 ± 4.58c | 25.00 ± 5.00b | 20.33 ± 2.08c | 0.30 ± 0.05cd | 0.70 ± 0.07c | 0.50 ± 0.04c |
0.15 | 16.67 ± 3.51b | 36.33 ± 4.51a | 32.33 ± 3.51a | 0.50 ± 0.03c | 1.30 ± 0.05a | 1.00 ± 0.09a |
0.20 | 24.33 ± 5.51a | 28.67 ± 4.04b | 26.33 ± 5.51b | 1.01 ± 0.04a | 0.90 ± 0.04a | 0.70 ± 0.05b |
0.25 | 21.00 ± 4.00a | 23.00 ± 2.00bc | 25.33 ± 3.51bc | 0.80 ± 0.04b | 0.75 ± 0.05c | 0.50 ± 0.04c |
Control | 4.33 ± 0.58d | 7.67 ± 2.52c | 7.00 ± 2.65d | 0.49 ± 0.06d | 0.49 ± 0.04d | 0.50 ± 0.03c |
LSD (P< 0.05) | 4.25 | 8.81 | 4.77 | 0.218 | 0.085 | 0.093 |
IAA(mg L-1) | Shoot elongation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of shoots per clump | Shoot length (cm) | |||||
TNPL 191 | TNPL 192 | TNPL193 | TNPL 191 | TNPL 192 | TNPL 193 | |
2.0 | 3.00 ± 1.00bc | 4.33 ± 0.58c | 3.33 ± 1.15bc | 2.33 ± 0.58b | 2.52 ± 0.38c | 2.00 ± 0.75b |
2.5 | 4.67 ± 2.08abc | 6.67 ±1.53ab | 5.33 ± 0.58ab | 4.33 ± 1.53a | 5.25 ± 1.15b | 4.42 ± 1.13a |
3.0 | 7.33 ± 2.52a | 9.33 ± 2.52a | 7.33 ± 0.58a | 6.33 ± 1.36a | 7.42 ± 1.91a | 5.92 ± 1.38a |
3.5 | 5.33 ± 1.53ab | 9.33 ± 4.51a | 5.00 ± 2.00b | 4.67 ± 0.58a | 6.58 ± 0.63ab | 5.08 ± 0.63a |
Control | 1.67 ± 0.58d | 3.67 ± 0.58c | 2.67 ± 0.58d | 1.33 ± 0.45b | 1.33 ± 0.29c | 0.97 ± 0.10b |
LSD (P< 0.05) | 2.87 | 5.93 | 1.27 | 1.13 | 1.12 |
IBA(mg L-1) | Rooting | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rooting (%) | Number of roots per shoot | |||||
TNPL 191 | TNPL 192 | TNPL193 | TNPL 191 | TNPL 192 | TNPL 193 | |
0.5 | 18.56 ± 1.22c | 25.41 ± 2.17c | 23.46 ± 2.35c | 2.33 ± 0.64b | 3.67 ± 0.68c | 4.67 ± 0.58bc |
1.0 | 86.33 ± 2.25a | 94.25 ± 2.49a | 87.29 ± 2.13a | 5.33 ± 1.53a | 8.33 ± 0.77a | 8.00 ± 1.00a |
1.5 | 87.31 ± 1.94a | 94.16 ± 2.65a | 85.18 ± 1.69a | 5.33 ± 0.58a | 6.67 ± 0.58b | 5.33 ± 0.86b |
2.0 | 65.24 ± 1.72b | 87.12 ±1.91b | 73.15 ± 2.66b | 3.33 ± 0.64b | 4.33 ± 0.56c | 3.67 ± 0.58c |
Control | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00c | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00d |
LSD (P< 0.05) | 5.69 | 5.38 | 3.11 | 0.67 | 0.27 | 0.40 |
PGR | Plant Growth Regulators |
IAA | Indole 3-acetic Acid |
IBA | Indole Butyric Acid |
BAP | 6-Benzylaminopurine |
MS | Murashige- Skoog |
RH | Relative Humidity |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
LSD | Least Significant Difference |
DMRT | Duncan’s Multiple Range Test |
[1] | Sharma, V., Ankita, Karnwal, A., Sharma, S., Kamal, B., Jadon, V. S., Gupta, S. &Sivanasen, I. A. (2023). Comprehensive Review Uncovering the Challenges and Advancements in the In Vitro Propagation of Eucalyptus Plantations. Plants, 12, 3018. |
[2] | Shanthi, K., Bachpai, V. K. W., Anisha, S., Ganesan, M., Anithaa, R. G., Subhasini, V., Chakravarthi, M., Sivakumar, V. &Yasodha, R. (2014). Micropropagation of Eucalyptus camaldulensis for the production of rejenuvated stock plants for microcuttings propagation and genetic fidelity assessment. New Forests, |
[3] | Varghese, M., Harwood, C. E., Hegde, R. & Ravi, N. (2008). Evaluation of provenances of Eucalyptus camaldulensisand clones of E. camaldulensisand E. tereticornisat contrasting sites in southern India. SilvaeGenetica, 57, 170–179. |
[4] | Varghese, M., Harwood, C. E., Bush, D. J., Baltunis, B., Kamalakannan, R., Suraj, P. G., Hegde, D. &Meder, R. (2017). Growth and wood properties of natural provenances, local seed sources and clones of Eucalyptus camadulensis in southern India: Implications for breeding and deployment. New Forests, 48, 67-82. |
[5] | Kamal, B., Arya, I., Sharma, V. &Jadon, V. S. (2016). In Vitro Enhanced Multiplication and Molecular Validation of Eucalyptus F1 Hybrids. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, 17, 167–175. |
[6] | Singh, D., Kaur, S. & Kumar, A. (2020). In Vitro Drought Tolerance in Selected Elite Clones of Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. ActaPhysiologiaePlantarum, 42, 17. |
[7] | Shwe, S. S. & Leung, D. W. M. (2020). Plant Regeneration from Eucalyptus bosistoana Callus Culture. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology- Plant, 56, 718–725. |
[8] | Matheus, D., Souza, S. C., Martins, A. R., Fernandes, S. B., Lopes Martins Avelar, M., Vaz Molinari, L., Santos Gonçalves, D. &Brondani, G. E. (2022). In Vitro Multiplication of Eucalyptus pilularis and Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla(Urograndis Eucalypt): Effect of Light Quality in Temporary Immersion Bioreactor. Mindanao Journal of Science and Technology, 20, 72–86. |
[9] | Rajput, B. S., Jani, M., Ramesh, K., Manokari, M, Jogam, P., Allini, V. R., Kher, M. M. &Shekhawat, M. S. (2020). Large- scale clonal propagation of BambusabalcooaRoxb.: an industrially important bamboo species. Industrial Crops & Products, |
[10] | Sowmya, K., Seenivasan, R., Subramanian, S., Chinnaraj, S., Brindhadevi, K. &Thamaraiselvi., K. (2019a). Minicutting: a powerful tool for the clonal propagation of selected species of Eucalyptus hybrid clones based on their pulpwood studies. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, |
[11] | Compton, M. E. & Koch, J. M. (2001). Influence of plant preservative mixture (PPM) TM on adventitious organogenesis in melon, petunia, and tobacco. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology- Plant, 37, 259–261. |
[12] | Sowmya, K., Seenivasan, R., Subramanian, S., Chinnaraj, S., Rajasree, S., Brindhadevi, K. &Thamaraiselvi., K. (2019b). Optimizing the sterilization methods for initiation of the five different clones of the Eucalyptus hybrid species. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, |
[13] | Murashige, T. &Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. PhysiologiaPlantarum, 15, 473–497. |
[14] | Mohamed, S. V., Sung, J. M., Jeng, T. L. & Wang, C. S. (2006). Organogenesis of PhseolusangularisL.: high efficiency of adventitious shoot regeneration from etiolated seedlings in the presence of N6- Benzylaminopurine and thidiazuran. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, |
[15] | Graner, E. M., Calderan-Meneghetti, E., Leone, G. F., Almeida, C. V. & Almeida, M. (2019). Long-term in vitro culture affects phenotypic plasticity of Neoregeliajohannisplants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 137(3), 511–524. |
[16] | Agustina, M., Maisura, M. &Handayani, R.S. (2020). The Effect of different seed cutting treatments and concentrations of BAP for the successful in vitromicrografting of mangosteen (GarciniamangostanaL.). Journal of Tropical Horticulture, 3(1), 1–5. |
[17] | Baccarin, F. J. B., Brondani, G. E., Almeida, L. V., Vieira, I. G., Oliveira, L. S. & Almeida, M. (2015). Vegetative rescue and cloning of Eucalyptus benthamiiselected adult trees. New Forests, 46, 465–483. |
[18] | Rosa, W. S., Martins, J. P. R., Santos, E. R., Rodrigues, L. C. A., Gontijo, A. B. P. L. I Falqueto, A. R. (2018). Photosynthetic apparatus performance in function of the cytokinins used during the in vitro multiplication of AechmeablanchetianaBromeliaceae). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 133, 339–350. |
[19] | Surakshitha, N. C., Soorianathasundaram, K., Ganga, M. &Raveendran, M. (2019). Alleviating shoot tip necrosis during in vitro propagation of grape cv. Red Globe. ScientiaHorticulturae, 248, 118–125. |
[20] | Martins, J. P. R., Wawrzyniak, M. K., Ley-Lopez, J. M., Kalemba, E. M., Mendes, M. M. &Chmielarz, P. (2022). 6-Benzylaminopurine and kinetin modulations during in vitro propagation of Quercusrobur (L.): an assessment of anatomical, biochemical and physiological profiling shoots. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, |
[21] | Abiri, R., Atabaki, N., Abdul- Hamid, H, Sansui, R., Shukor, N. A. A., Shaharuddin, N. A., Ahmad, S. A. & Malik, S. (2020). The prospect of physiological events associated with the microproagation of Eucalyptus Sp. Forests, 11(1211), |
[22] | Girijashankar, V. (2012). In vitro regeneration of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Physiology and Molecular Biology ofPlants, 18(1), 79–87. |
[23] | Ayala, P. G., Brugnoli, E. A., Luna, C. V., Gonzalez, A. M., Pezzutti, R. &Sansberro, P. A. (2019). Eucalyptus nitensplant regeneration from seedling explants through direct adventitious shoot bud formation. Trees, 33, 1667–1678. |
[24] | Nic-Can, G. I. & Loyola-Vargas, V. M. (2016). The role of the auxins during somatic embryogenesis. In: Somatic Embryogenesis: Fundamental Aspects and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 171–182. |
[25] | Moura, L. C. D., Xavier, A., Cruz, A. C. F. D., Gallo, R., Miranda, N. A. &Otoni, W. C. (2019). Auxin pulse in the induction of somatic embryos of Eucalyptus. RevistaÁrvore, 43, 1–12. |
APA Style
Naickar, M. C., Palanisamy, C., Vazram, P., Kuppusamy, J., Thangavel, S., et al. (2024). Optimizing Growth Regulators for Micropropagation of Industrially Adaptable Eucalyptus Hybrids. Journal of Plant Sciences, 12(3), 82-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241203.13
ACS Style
Naickar, M. C.; Palanisamy, C.; Vazram, P.; Kuppusamy, J.; Thangavel, S., et al. Optimizing Growth Regulators for Micropropagation of Industrially Adaptable Eucalyptus Hybrids. J. Plant Sci. 2024, 12(3), 82-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20241203.13
AMA Style
Naickar MC, Palanisamy C, Vazram P, Kuppusamy J, Thangavel S, et al. Optimizing Growth Regulators for Micropropagation of Industrially Adaptable Eucalyptus Hybrids. J Plant Sci. 2024;12(3):82-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20241203.13
@article{10.11648/j.jps.20241203.13, author = {Malaimuthu Chinnama Naickar and Chezhian Palanisamy and Prasath Vazram and Jayakumar Kuppusamy and Stalin Thangavel and Rajesh Ramasamy}, title = {Optimizing Growth Regulators for Micropropagation of Industrially Adaptable Eucalyptus Hybrids }, journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences}, volume = {12}, number = {3}, pages = {82-89}, doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20241203.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241203.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20241203.13}, abstract = {Eucalyptus is one of the highly economic tree species in the developing countries like India. In the present investigation, experiments on optimizing plant growth regulators in the micropropagation of promising inter specific Eucalyptus hybrid clones namely TNPL 191(E. camaldulensis× E. teriticornis), TNPL 192 (E. camaldulensis × E. pellita) and intra specific hybrid clone TNPL 193 (E. camaldulensis× E. camaldulensis) were conducted, following standard protocols developed for Eucalyptus. The results showed that the BAP concentration of 0.50 mg L-1 for bud induction, IAA concentration of 3.0 mg L-1 for shoot elongation and IBA concentration of 1.0 mg L-1 for rooting of all these clones were found optimal. However, these three hybrid clones responded differently to the concentration of BAP at shoot proliferation stage. While the hybrid TNPL 191 showed maximum shoot proliferation rate at the concentration of 0.2 mg L-1 of BAP, the hybrids TNPL 192 and TNPL 193 showed highest response at 0.15 mg L-1. All the in vitro rooted plantlets were acclimatized successfully to the prevailing natural environment. Thus, the protocols developed with respect to optimizing the plant growth regulators can be adapted in large scale micro propagation of inter and intra specific Eucalyptus hybrid clones. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Optimizing Growth Regulators for Micropropagation of Industrially Adaptable Eucalyptus Hybrids AU - Malaimuthu Chinnama Naickar AU - Chezhian Palanisamy AU - Prasath Vazram AU - Jayakumar Kuppusamy AU - Stalin Thangavel AU - Rajesh Ramasamy Y1 - 2024/06/27 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241203.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jps.20241203.13 T2 - Journal of Plant Sciences JF - Journal of Plant Sciences JO - Journal of Plant Sciences SP - 82 EP - 89 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0731 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241203.13 AB - Eucalyptus is one of the highly economic tree species in the developing countries like India. In the present investigation, experiments on optimizing plant growth regulators in the micropropagation of promising inter specific Eucalyptus hybrid clones namely TNPL 191(E. camaldulensis× E. teriticornis), TNPL 192 (E. camaldulensis × E. pellita) and intra specific hybrid clone TNPL 193 (E. camaldulensis× E. camaldulensis) were conducted, following standard protocols developed for Eucalyptus. The results showed that the BAP concentration of 0.50 mg L-1 for bud induction, IAA concentration of 3.0 mg L-1 for shoot elongation and IBA concentration of 1.0 mg L-1 for rooting of all these clones were found optimal. However, these three hybrid clones responded differently to the concentration of BAP at shoot proliferation stage. While the hybrid TNPL 191 showed maximum shoot proliferation rate at the concentration of 0.2 mg L-1 of BAP, the hybrids TNPL 192 and TNPL 193 showed highest response at 0.15 mg L-1. All the in vitro rooted plantlets were acclimatized successfully to the prevailing natural environment. Thus, the protocols developed with respect to optimizing the plant growth regulators can be adapted in large scale micro propagation of inter and intra specific Eucalyptus hybrid clones. VL - 12 IS - 3 ER -